Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[PRE REVIEW]: An Implementation of Quality Minus Junk with R #7701

Open
editorialbot opened this issue Jan 21, 2025 · 19 comments
Open

[PRE REVIEW]: An Implementation of Quality Minus Junk with R #7701

editorialbot opened this issue Jan 21, 2025 · 19 comments
Labels
pre-review query-scope Submissions of uncertain scope for JOSS R TeX Track: 5 (DSAIS) Data Science, Artificial Intelligence, and Machine Learning

Comments

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Submitting author: @yanrong-stacy-song (Yanrong Song)
Repository: https://github.com/anttsou/qmj
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): master
Version: v0.2.1
Editor: Pending
Reviewers: Pending
Managing EiC: Chris Vernon

Status

status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/99315a599418583761be717377f537c5"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/99315a599418583761be717377f537c5/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/99315a599418583761be717377f537c5/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/99315a599418583761be717377f537c5)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @yanrong-stacy-song. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@yanrong-stacy-song if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands
@editorialbot editorialbot added pre-review Track: 5 (DSAIS) Data Science, Artificial Intelligence, and Machine Learning labels Jan 21, 2025
@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

✅ OK DOIs

- None

🟡 SKIP DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: Backtests
- No DOI given, and none found for title: MSCI Quality Indices Methodology
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Russell U.S Equity Indexes: Construction and Metho...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Quantitative Value: A Practitioner’s Guide to Auto...

❌ MISSING DOIs

- 10.2139/ssrn.2312432 may be a valid DOI for title: Quality Minus Junk
- 10.2307/2490395 may be a valid DOI for title: Financial Ratios and the Probabilistic Prediction ...
- 10.2139/ssrn.2543990 may be a valid DOI for title: Foundations of Factor Investing
- 10.32614/cran.package.quantmod may be a valid DOI for title: quantmod: Quantitative Financial Modelling Framewo...
- 10.32614/cran.package.backtest may be a valid DOI for title: backtest: Exploring portfolio-based conjectures ab...

❌ INVALID DOIs

- None

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.98  T=0.02 s (1608.7 files/s, 255404.6 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Text                             1              0              0           3140
R                               26            248            836            850
TeX                              2             13              3             80
Markdown                         3             28              0             66
JSON                             1              2              0             51
Rmd                              1             28             40             13
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            34            319            879           4200
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

   404	Ryan Kwon
   352	Anthoney Tsou
    17	David Kane
     6	anttsou
     6	davidkane9
     6	eugene-choe
     4	Eugene Choe
     2	yanrong_stacy_song
     1	knightsay

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 535

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

License info:

🔴 Failed to discover a valid open source license

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

quantile-forest: A Python Package for Quantile Regression Forests
Submitting author: @reidjohnson
Handling editor: @jbytecode (Active)
Reviewers: @jncraton, @oparisot
Similarity score: 0.6588

qsort R package: A New Tool for Scoring Q-sort Data
Submitting author: @davidnsousa
Handling editor: @leeper (Retired)
Reviewers: @maxheld83
Similarity score: 0.6498

dataquieR: assessment of data quality in epidemiological research
Submitting author: @
Handling editor: @csoneson (Active)
Reviewers: @borishejblum, @cmirzayi
Similarity score: 0.6426

qualtRics: retrieve survey data using the Qualtrics API
Submitting author: @JasperHG90
Handling editor: @karthik (Retired)
Reviewers: @arfon
Similarity score: 0.6421

daiquiri: Data Quality Reporting for Temporal Datasets
Submitting author: @phuongquan
Handling editor: @arfon (Active)
Reviewers: @arfon
Similarity score: 0.6411

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

@yanrong-stacy-song
Copy link

@editorialbot commands

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Hello @yanrong-stacy-song, here are the things you can ask me to do:


# List all available commands
@editorialbot commands

# Get a list of all editors's GitHub handles
@editorialbot list editors

# Adds a checklist for the reviewer using this command
@editorialbot generate my checklist

# Set a value for branch
@editorialbot set joss-paper as branch

# Run checks and provide information on the repository and the paper file
@editorialbot check repository

# Check the references of the paper for missing DOIs
@editorialbot check references

# Generates the pdf paper
@editorialbot generate pdf

# Generates a LaTeX preprint file
@editorialbot generate preprint

# Get a link to the complete list of reviewers
@editorialbot list reviewers

@yanrong-stacy-song
Copy link

@editorialbot check repository

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.98  T=0.02 s (1637.4 files/s, 256141.1 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Text                             1              0              0           3140
R                               26            248            836            850
TeX                              3             21              3            149
Markdown                         3             28              0             66
JSON                             1              2              0             51
Rmd                              1             28             40             13
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            35            327            879           4269
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

   404	Ryan Kwon
   352	Anthoney Tsou
    17	David Kane
     6	anttsou
     6	davidkane9
     6	eugene-choe
     4	Eugene Choe
     3	knightsay
     2	yanrong_stacy_song

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 535

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

License info:

🟡 License found: GNU General Public License v3.0 (Check here for OSI approval)

@yanrong-stacy-song
Copy link

@editorialbot check references

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

✅ OK DOIs

- 10.2139/ssrn.2312432 is OK
- 10.2307/2490395 is OK
- 10.2139/ssrn.2543990 is OK
- 10.32614/cran.package.quantmod is OK
- 10.32614/cran.package.backtest is OK

🟡 SKIP DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: Backtests
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Russell U.S Equity Indexes: Construction and Metho...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Quantitative Value: A Practitioner’s Guide to Auto...

❌ MISSING DOIs

- 10.2139/ssrn.2543990 may be a valid DOI for title: Foundations of Factor Investing

❌ INVALID DOIs

- None

@yanrong-stacy-song
Copy link

@editorialbot check references

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

✅ OK DOIs

- 10.2139/ssrn.2312432 is OK
- 10.2307/2490395 is OK
- 10.2139/ssrn.2543990 is OK
- 10.32614/cran.package.quantmod is OK
- 10.32614/cran.package.backtest is OK

🟡 SKIP DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: Backtests
- No DOI given, and none found for title: MSCI Quality Indices Methodology
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Russell U.S Equity Indexes: Construction and Metho...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Quantitative Value: A Practitioner’s Guide to Auto...

❌ MISSING DOIs

- None

❌ INVALID DOIs

- None

@crvernon
Copy link

@editorialbot query scope

👋 @yanrong-stacy-song - I am going to run this one by our larger editorial board for review to see if this submission meets our substantial scholarly effort requirements. I'll be back in touch ASAP.

@editorialbot
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Submission flagged for editorial review.

@editorialbot editorialbot added the query-scope Submissions of uncertain scope for JOSS label Jan 28, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
pre-review query-scope Submissions of uncertain scope for JOSS R TeX Track: 5 (DSAIS) Data Science, Artificial Intelligence, and Machine Learning
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants