[PRE REVIEW]: LongMemory.jl: Generating, Estimating, and Forecasting Long Memory Models in Julia

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @everval (J. Eduardo Vera-Valdés)
Repository: https://github.com/everval/LongMemory.jl
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): JOSS-submission
Version: v0.1.2
Editor: @lrnv
Reviewers: @PieterjanRobbe, @Santymax98, @ismailguzel, @baxmittens
Managing EiC: Chris Vernon

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/bbc83cd4c1a9158d36da072a9ae2ac0e"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/bbc83cd4c1a9158d36da072a9ae2ac0e/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/bbc83cd4c1a9158d36da072a9ae2ac0e/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/bbc83cd4c1a9158d36da072a9ae2ac0e)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @everval. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@everval if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

✅ OK DOIs

- 10.1007/978-3-642-35512-7 is OK
- 10.48550/arXiv.2412.13855 is OK
- 10.1080/02626665609493644 is OK

🟡 SKIP DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: ‘fracdiff‘: Fractionally Differenced ARIMA Models
- No DOI given, and none found for title: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Comp...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: ‘longmemo‘: Statistics for Long-Memory Processes a...
- No DOI given, and none found for title: Effects of the Paris Agreement and the COVID-19 Pa...

❌ MISSING DOIs

- 10.32614/cran.package.longmemoryts may be a valid DOI for title: ‘LongMemoryTS‘: Long Memory Time Series

❌ INVALID DOIs

- https://doi.org/10.1137/141000671 is INVALID because of 'https://doi.org/' prefix

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.98  T=0.03 s (1285.3 files/s, 133533.4 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Julia                           13            822           1195            996
Markdown                        13            140              0            253
YAML                             5              3              7            191
TeX                              2              8              0             82
TOML                             3              5              0             38
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            36            978           1202           1560
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

   122	everval
     8	CompatHelper Julia

[editorialbot]

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 560

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

[editorialbot]

License info:

✅ License found: MIT License (Valid open source OSI approved license)

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

GaussianRandomFields.jl: A Julia package to generate and sample from Gaussian random fields
Submitting author: @PieterjanRobbe
Handling editor: @jbytecode (Active)
Reviewers: @ziyiyin97, @shahmoradi
Similarity score: 0.7492

IndividualDisplacements.jl: a Julia package to simulate and study particle displacements within the climate system
Submitting author: @gaelforget
Handling editor: @kthyng (Active)
Reviewers: @milankl, @visr
Similarity score: 0.7430

OpenGeoSysUncertaintyQuantification.jl: a Julia library implementing an uncertainty quantification toolbox for OpenGeoSys
Submitting author: @baxmittens
Handling editor: @kanishkan91 (Active)
Reviewers: @ziyiyin97, @dannys4
Similarity score: 0.7422

Vlasiator.jl: A Julia package for processing Vlasiator data
Submitting author: @henry2004y
Handling editor: @pdebuyl (Active)
Reviewers: @ranocha, @tkoskela
Similarity score: 0.7388

SyntheticEddyMethod.jl: A Julia package for the creation of inlet flow conditions for LES
Submitting author: @carlodev
Handling editor: @philipcardiff (Active)
Reviewers: @atzberg, @akshaysridhar
Similarity score: 0.7387

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[lrnv]

@editorialbot assign me as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @lrnv is now the editor

[lrnv]

Greeting @everval ! I'll be your editor for this submission. Great proposal in my opinon.

Our first common task is to find reviewers suitable to review your work. Would you know of a few individuals that would be suited as reviewers on this work ? If you could give me a few GitHub tags without @'ing them that would be great. I'll look for a few myself too.

Note that you also have an invalid DOI that you can already fix.

[everval]

Hi @lrnv thank you for the kind words.

Going through the list, I think that: Dom-Owens-UoB, SaranjeetKaur, sgeorge91, daviddewhurst, or ismailguzel could be great reviewers.

I already fixed the invalid DOI and I aim to retry adding the ones missing if they exist.

[lrnv]

@iblislin @Dom-Owens-UoB, @SaranjeetKaur greetings :) Would any of you agree to review this submission for JOSS ? We cary on checklist-based reviews, you can read about our processes at https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html

[lrnv]

@PieterjanRobbe same thing: Would you be interested in reviewing this paper for JOSS ?

[PieterjanRobbe]

Hi @lrnv , this looks like a very interesting package, I'd be interested in reviewing.

[lrnv]

@gaelforget, @baxmittens, would any of you be interested in reviewing this paper for JOSS ?

[lrnv]

@Santymax98, would you be interested in reviewing this paper for JOSS ?

[Santymax98]

Hi dear Oskar, do you need a time limit? I have two weeks full of work… I can start from de first of February El El jue, 23 ene. 2025 a la(s) 9:01, Oskar Laverny < ***@***.***> escribió:

…

@Santymax98 <https://github.com/Santymax98>, would you be interested in reviewing this paper for JOSS ? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#7665 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A7PTWNU5TBUJFTCEWQO44TL2MDY2LAVCNFSM6AAAAABVE6UIZ2VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDMMBZHA4DINRSGI> . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[lrnv]

Nope, there is no time limit @Santymax98, so you should be good to go.

[Santymax98]

So yes, I can review it after February 1… without any problem 🚀 El El jue, 23 ene. 2025 a la(s) 9:48, Oskar Laverny < ***@***.***> escribió:

…

Nope, there is no time limit @Santymax98 <https://github.com/Santymax98>, so you should be good to go. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#7665 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A7PTWNVXXFCOE444JNW2XIT2MD6NRAVCNFSM6AAAAABVE6UIZ2VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDMMJQGAYDSNJQGU> . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[lrnv]

@sgeorge91, @daviddewhurst, or @ismailguzel would any of you by chance be willing to review this submission for JOSS ?

[baxmittens]

I would be available only after the 11th of February. Before that, I am on business travel.

[ismailguzel]

It sounds intriguing! I would be interested in being a reviewer for that submission to JOSS.

[lrnv]

@editorialbot add @PieterjanRobbe as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@PieterjanRobbe added to the reviewers list!

[lrnv]

@editorialbot add @Santymax98 as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@Santymax98 added to the reviewers list!

[lrnv]

@editorialbot add @ismailguzel as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@ismailguzel added to the reviewers list!

[lrnv]

@editorialbot add @baxmittens as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@baxmittens added to the reviewers list!

[lrnv]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in #7708.