[PRE REVIEW]: CAD_to_OpenMC: from CAD design to particle transport #7369
Comments
|
Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks. For a list of things I can do to help you, just type: For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type: |
|
Checking the BibTeX entries failed with the following error: |
|
|
|
Software report: Commit count by author: |
|
Paper file info: |
|
License info: ✅ License found: |
|
Hi @ebknudsen, we will use this issue to assign an editor and find reviewers; any recommendations for the latter would be welcome (though please do not invite/tag them yourself). Unfortunately, our editors in this area already have a full load of assignments, so I have to place this in our backlog until someone becomes available. |
kyleniemeyer
added
the
waitlisted
|
Getting back to this with a somewhat silly question: For any suggestions for reviewer, should I just put them here? |
|
@ebknudsen yes, you can just share some names here, but do not tag them directly with @ (the editor will reach out) |
|
Allright: Here are a few suggestions: |
|
@editorialbot assign me as editor |
|
Assigned! @mbarzegary is now the editor |
|
@editorialbot generate pdf |
|
|
|
Wait! Is there any JOSS paper here in this submission? |
|
I certainly thought so... if not something must have gone haywire. I'll look into the matter ASAP. |
|
I think I have been confused by repos - the paper lives here: https://github.com/ebknudsen/c2omc_joss |
|
@editorialbot commands |
|
Hello @ebknudsen, here are the things you can ask me to do: |
|
@editorialbot set joss-paper as branch |
|
Done! branch is now joss-paper |
|
@editorialbot generate pdf |
|
@editorialbot set paper_joss as branch |
|
Done! branch is now paper_joss |
|
@editorialbot generate pdf |
|
Five most similar historical JOSS papers: model-traits: Model attribute definitions for scientific simulations in C++ BasicTools: a numerical simulation toolbox OpenCMP: An Open-Source Computational Multiphysics Package feign: a Python package to estimate geometric efficiency in passive gamma spectroscopy measurements of nuclear fuel Efficient Polyhedral Gravity Modeling in Modern C++ and Python |
|
@editorialbot check references |
|
kyleniemeyer
removed
the
waitlisted
|
Hi @fbordeu, @nasserma, @jacobmerson, @schuhmaj 👋 Paper: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openjournals/joss-papers/joss.07369/joss.07369/10.21105.joss.07369.pdf |
|
@mbarzegary I would be willing to review this submission. |
|
@editorialbot add @nasserma as reviewer |
|
@nasserma added to the reviewers list! |
|
@nasserma I'd be happy to review. |
|
@editorialbot add @jacobmerson as reviewer |
|
@jacobmerson added to the reviewers list! |
|
Hi @pratikvn, @WilkAndy, @bonh, @daniellivingston👋 Paper: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openjournals/joss-papers/joss.07369/joss.07369/10.21105.joss.07369.pdf |
|
Looks interesting and I'd be happy to review it |
|
I feel my expertise doesn't quite match with this paper, so i wouldn't be able to provide a holistic review. Therefore, I'll decline to review at present. If you haven't found suitable reviewers by, say, mid-March, please contact me again, and I'll do my best (commenting on the software aspects, rather than the relevance/usefulness of the code). |
|
@WilkAndy thank you for the clarification. I believe we have now secured sufficient number of reviewers for this submission. |
|
@editorialbot add @bonh as reviewer |
|
@bonh added to the reviewers list! |
|
@editorialbot start review |
|
OK, I've started the review over in #7710. |
Submitting author: @ebknudsen (Erik B Knudsen)
Repository: https://www.github.com/openmsr/CAD_to_OpenMC
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch): paper_joss
Version: v1.0.0
Editor: @mbarzegary
Reviewers: @nasserma, @jacobmerson, @bonh
Managing EiC: Kyle Niemeyer
Status
Status badge code:
Author instructions
Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @ebknudsen. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.
@ebknudsen if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.
Editor instructions
The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: