[PRE REVIEW]: easyCHEM: A Python package for calculating chemical equilibrium abundances in exoplanet atmospheres

[editorialbot]

Submitting author: @mauricemolli (Paul Mollière)
Repository: https://gitlab.com/EliseLei/easychem
Branch with paper.md (empty if default branch):
Version: 2.0.6
Editor: @arfon
Reviewers: @Nicholaswogan, @danehkar
Managing EiC: Dan Foreman-Mackey

Status

Status badge code:

HTML: <a href="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/b2f16c3e1f3795da96c343a0b7bc115a"><img src="https://joss.theoj.org/papers/b2f16c3e1f3795da96c343a0b7bc115a/status.svg"></a>
Markdown: [![status](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/b2f16c3e1f3795da96c343a0b7bc115a/status.svg)](https://joss.theoj.org/papers/b2f16c3e1f3795da96c343a0b7bc115a)

Author instructions

Thanks for submitting your paper to JOSS @mauricemolli. Currently, there isn't a JOSS editor assigned to your paper.

@mauricemolli if you have any suggestions for potential reviewers then please mention them here in this thread (without tagging them with an @). You can search the list of people that have already agreed to review and may be suitable for this submission.

Editor instructions

The JOSS submission bot @editorialbot is here to help you find and assign reviewers and start the main review. To find out what @editorialbot can do for you type:

@editorialbot commands

[editorialbot]

Hello human, I'm @editorialbot, a robot that can help you with some common editorial tasks.

For a list of things I can do to help you, just type:

@editorialbot commands

For example, to regenerate the paper pdf after making changes in the paper's md or bib files, type:

@editorialbot generate pdf

[editorialbot]

Reference check summary (note 'MISSING' DOIs are suggestions that need verification):

✅ OK DOIs

- 10.1051/0004-6361/201629800 is OK
- 10.3847/1538-4357/aa95be is OK
- 10.1051/0004-6361/202449328 is OK
- 10.1051/0004-6361/202348508 is OK
- 10.1093/mnras/stad3515 is OK
- 10.3847/0067-0049/225/1/4 is OK

🟡 SKIP DOIs

- No DOI given, and none found for title: Computer Program for Calculation of Complex Chemic...

❌ MISSING DOIs

- None

❌ INVALID DOIs

- None

[editorialbot]

Software report:

github.com/AlDanial/cloc v 1.90  T=0.03 s (590.3 files/s, 253477.0 lines/s)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Language                     files          blank        comment           code
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fortran 90                       1            321            930           2914
Jupyter Notebook                 1              0            783            599
Python                           3            142            196            393
TeX                              1              9              0            112
reStructuredText                 3             69             43             91
Markdown                         2             17              4             71
Meson                            2             12              8             59
TOML                             1              4              2             48
YAML                             1              4             11             10
make                             1              4              6              9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SUM:                            16            582           1983           4306
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commit count by author:

    51	mauricemollie
    15	mauricemolli
    14	EliseLei

[editorialbot]

Paper file info:

📄 Wordcount for paper.md is 517

✅ The paper includes a Statement of need section

[editorialbot]

License info:

✅ License found: MIT License (Valid open source OSI approved license)

[dfm]

@mauricemolli — Thanks for your submission and sorry for the delay getting this started! Somehow this ended up in a different "track" and slipped through the cracks.

Unfortunately, all the suitable JOSS editors are currently working at capacity so I'm going to "waitlist" this review until an editor with the relevant expertise is available to take it on. Thanks for your patience!

[editorialbot]

👉📄 Download article proof 📄 View article proof on GitHub 📄 👈

[editorialbot]

Five most similar historical JOSS papers:

pyEQUIB Python Package, an addendum to proEQUIB: IDL Library for Plasma Diagnostics and Abundance Analysis
Submitting author: @danehkar
Handling editor: @arfon (Active)
Reviewers: @arfon
Similarity score: 0.7510

ExoTETHyS: Tools for Exoplanetary Transits around host stars
Submitting author: @gmorello
Handling editor: @arfon (Active)
Reviewers: @steven-murray, @williamjameshandley
Similarity score: 0.7471

POSEIDON: A Multidimensional Atmospheric Retrieval Code for Exoplanet Spectra
Submitting author: @MartianColonist
Handling editor: @dfm (Active)
Reviewers: @ideasrule, @LorenzoMugnai
Similarity score: 0.7328

The Dusty Evolved Star Kit (DESK): A Python package for fitting the Spectral Energy Distribution of Evolved Stars
Submitting author: @s-goldman
Handling editor: @arfon (Active)
Reviewers: @Deech08, @TomGoffrey
Similarity score: 0.7297

3D Line Radiative Transfer & Synthetic Observations with Magritte
Submitting author: @FredDeCeuster
Handling editor: @xuanxu (Active)
Reviewers: @gonsie, @CFGrote
Similarity score: 0.7279

⚠️ Note to editors: If these papers look like they might be a good match, click through to the review issue for that paper and invite one or more of the authors before considering asking the reviewers of these papers to review again for JOSS.

[mauricemolli]

Hi @dfm , no worries, I had tentatively planned to check in with you to ask about it, but great that things are underway now. Below a list of potential reviewers. As far as I can see non of them have reviewed for JOSS before though:

• Nick Wogan
• Patricio Cubillos
• Daniel Kitzmann
• Jasmina Blecic

[mauricemolli]

@editorialbot generate preprint

[editorialbot]

📄 Preprint file created: Find it here in the Artifacts list 📄

[arfon]

@editorialbot assign me as editor

[editorialbot]

Assigned! @arfon is now the editor

[arfon]

👋 @danehkar @MartianColonist @Nicholaswogan – would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? The submission under consideration is easyCHEM: A Python package for calculating chemical equilibrium abundances in exoplanet atmospheres

The review process at JOSS is unique: it takes place in a GitHub issue, is open, and author-reviewer-editor conversations are encouraged. You can learn more about the process in these guidelines: https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/reviewer_guidelines.html

Based on your experience, we think you might be able to provide a great review of this submission. Please let me know if you think you can help us out!

Many thanks
Arfon

[Nicholaswogan]

I'm happy to be a reviewer! Just give me the instructions, and I'll do it.

[danehkar]

👋 @danehkar @MartianColonist @Nicholaswogan – would any of you be willing to review this submission for JOSS? The submission under consideration is easyCHEM: A Python package for calculating chemical equilibrium abundances in exoplanet atmospheres

I am willing to review it.

[arfon]

@editorialbot add @Nicholaswogan as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@Nicholaswogan added to the reviewers list!

[arfon]

@editorialbot add @danehkar as reviewer

[editorialbot]

@danehkar added to the reviewers list!

[arfon]

@editorialbot start review

[editorialbot]

OK, I've started the review over in #7712.

[arfon]

@Nicholaswogan, @danehkar – thanks so much for agreeing to review this submission! See you over in #7712 where the actual review will take place.