-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Tracking]: Move JOSS to use this framework #46
Comments
Is there a timeline on this? Inability to deploy changes to |
I don't think there's a detailed timeline other than "fairly soon", but any work on the LaTeX template and production can already happen in the new Inara project. This has the added benefit that we have a controlled environment, so shipping changes will be much easier. |
Oh, thanks! Should I recreate openjournals/whedon#105 there? |
@arfon may be able to move the issue from one repo to the other. I hadn't seen the issue before, but I'll keep it in mind going forward! |
It's a pull request to whedon's |
Ah sorry, I missed that it's a PR. A new PR would be welcome. |
Ultimately we want to move away from Whedon-API to use this more generalised framework for JOSS.
This will require a number of changes under the hood:
Also, we'll need to verify the changes with JOSE and Julia Conference proceedings before we declare victory.
/ cc @xuanxu and @tarleb to expand on this list.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: