generated from opencontainers/project-template
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments on proposals A / B / D #11
Comments
Hi, dave,
Very good comments, especially how to define a common interest spec which
can sustain in long term.
The proposal B is mainly from nodes validation angle, but not from the
runtime image selection.
To fulfill image selection use cases and validation use cases at the same
time, that's the challenge to be discussed.
All requirements were summerized in this doc:
https://github.com/opencontainers/wg-image-compatibility/blob/main/docs/REQUIREMENTS.md
Best Regards
Chaoyi Huang(Joe Huang)
Dave Trudgian ***@***.***> 于2024年3月2日周六 00:23写道:
… I was approached by @vsoch <https://github.com/vsoch> asking for comment
on the proposals at:
I don't have a huge amount of time, at present, to think very deeply about
it. However, I've read through the proposals and some brief thoughts are
here:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10z3M307qh2GpC-on9hx5uuvTqXzjIl1MbsL7-6sgp4A/edit?usp=sharing
Cheers.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#11>, or
unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AB36E7TF664VHHCGY2A23X3YWCTQTAVCNFSM6AAAAABECBCOG6VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ASLTON2WKOZSGE3DGNZTHA3TCNA>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
I was approached by @vsoch asking for comment on the proposals at:
https://github.com/opencontainers/wg-image-compatibility/tree/main/docs/proposals
I don't have a huge amount of time, at present, to think very deeply about it. However, I've read through the proposals and some brief thoughts are here:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/10z3M307qh2GpC-on9hx5uuvTqXzjIl1MbsL7-6sgp4A/edit?usp=sharing
Cheers.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: