Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ecuador R022, R023, R024, R028, R058 collusion indicators #89

Open
6 of 10 tasks
Camilamila opened this issue Oct 27, 2023 · 8 comments
Open
6 of 10 tasks

Ecuador R022, R023, R024, R028, R058 collusion indicators #89

Camilamila opened this issue Oct 27, 2023 · 8 comments
Assignees
Labels
cmd:indicators Relating to the indicators command
Milestone

Comments

@Camilamila
Copy link

Camilamila commented Oct 27, 2023

  • For Ecuador these indicators will only be calculated for Reverse auctions (procurementMethodDetails='Subasta Inversa Electrónica'). We verified with Sercop and they agreed the indicators can be calculated for this method.
    • Solution: Set (and use) price_comparison_procurement_methods
    • R022 "Great disparity in offer prices"
    • R023 Fixed-multiple bid prices
    • R024 Price close to winning bid
    • R028 Identical bid prices
  • All reverse auctions have 1 round but the same bidder can submit multiple bids per round. For the indicators we can consider the last bid.
    • Solution: Don't compare a tenderer's bid to its other bids.
    • R022
    • R023
    • R024 (see comment below)
    • R028 (see comment below)
  • Exclude R058, since after 2022 they automatically eliminate bids that are lower than 50% of the reference price.
@jpmckinney
Copy link
Member

Ok, so I'll change R058 to "no" in the spreadsheet.

@jpmckinney
Copy link
Member

For R028 (Different tenderers submitted bids with the same price.) do we need to only consider the last bid? It seems fine to consider all bids by the same tenderer.

@jpmckinney
Copy link
Member

jpmckinney commented Oct 27, 2023

For R024 (Price close to winning bid), I've now fixed a bug, so that we treat the lowest bid by the winner as the winning bid. We don't need to exclude any bids from non-winners, since each is individually compared to the winning bid to determine the second-lowest (and we already don't compare the winner's other bids to itself).

@jpmckinney
Copy link
Member

For Ecuador these indicators will only be calculated for Reverse auctions

Although R036 is not calculated for Ecuador, I've made the new configuration (price_comparison_procurement_methods) apply to R036 (in addition to the others).

@jpmckinney jpmckinney transferred this issue from open-contracting/bi.open-contracting.org May 17, 2024
@jpmckinney jpmckinney added the cmd:indicators Relating to the indicators command label May 17, 2024
@jpmckinney jpmckinney modified the milestones: Priority, Power BI May 17, 2024
@jpmckinney
Copy link
Member

All reverse auctions have 1 round but the same bidder can submit multiple bids per round. For the indicators we can consider the last bid.

@Camilamila I don't see the problem with considering all bids, not just the last?

@jpmckinney jpmckinney assigned Camilamila and unassigned jpmckinney May 17, 2024
@Camilamila
Copy link
Author

For R024, if we already don't compare the winner's other bids to itself, as you mention then it wouldn't be a problem. Similar to R028

@jpmckinney
Copy link
Member

And similar for R022 and R023 (i.e. as long as we don't compare a tenderer's own bids to each other) ?

@Camilamila
Copy link
Author

Yes!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cmd:indicators Relating to the indicators command
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants