Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

-PLUS variants for SCRAM #4

Open
Neustradamus opened this issue Nov 15, 2019 · 4 comments
Open

-PLUS variants for SCRAM #4

Neustradamus opened this issue Nov 15, 2019 · 4 comments

Comments

@Neustradamus
Copy link

Neustradamus commented Nov 15, 2019

There is no indication about RFC7677: SCRAM-SHA-256 and SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS Simple Authentication and Security Layer (SASL) Mechanisms


"When using the SASL SCRAM mechanism, the SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS variant SHOULD be preferred over the SCRAM-SHA-256 variant, and SHA-256 variants [RFC7677] SHOULD be preferred over SHA-1 variants [RFC5802]".

https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/hash-recommendations.html

-PLUS variants:

LDAP:

  • RFC5803: Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP) Schema for Storing Salted: Challenge Response Authentication Mechanism (SCRAM) Secrets: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5803

HTTP:

2FA:

IANA:

Linked to:

@ogrebgr
Copy link
Owner

ogrebgr commented Nov 15, 2019

Sorry, I am not sure what are you asking exactly...
Supported algos are: SCRAM-SHA-1, SCRAM-SHA-256, SCRAM-SHA-512.
I don't know that the "-PLUS" means...

@Neustradamus
Copy link
Author

SCRAM-SHA-256 is from RFC7677 ;)

-PLUS variants are in RFC5802 and RFC7677 too.

Can you add support of Channel Bindings?

@ogrebgr
Copy link
Owner

ogrebgr commented Nov 16, 2019

Yes, I can but currently I don't have much free time... :-(
Do you need this urgently?

@Neustradamus Neustradamus changed the title RFC7677 is not specified, can you add support? -PLUS variants work too? -PLUS variants for SCRAM Nov 12, 2020
@Neustradamus
Copy link
Author

It is official, it is here: RFC 9266: Channel Bindings for TLS 1.3:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants