Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Checkboxes to improve graph output #2

Open
burnout87 opened this issue May 3, 2022 · 6 comments
Open

Checkboxes to improve graph output #2

burnout87 opened this issue May 3, 2022 · 6 comments

Comments

@burnout87
Copy link
Collaborator

burnout87 commented May 3, 2022

  • the idea is to perform a query over the graph at each click and each the query is built using the information of the node clicked
  • clearly, the amount of information returned does not allow a clear reading and interpretation of the graph, and this is east to notice given the current output
  • reason why:
    • a sent of properties will be defined and read that will adjust certain graphical behaviors (eg nodes color, font, size etc etc)
    • a number of checkboxes will also be included to help to enable the application of certain rules of the behavior of the graph (eg extract all the subnodes information of an AstroObject and expand its label)
  • at the end, the graph displayed will "converge" in the hard coded graph
@burnout87
Copy link
Collaborator Author

burnout87 commented May 4, 2022

  • a number of checkboxes will also be included to help to enable the application of certain rules of the behavior of the graph (eg extract all the subnodes information of an AstroObject and expand its label)

Will be a set of "strings" to apply to the sparql query, to execute a set of "sub-selection" over the graph

@burnout87
Copy link
Collaborator Author

e.g. keep only astroquery-related, or all renku

@burnout87
Copy link
Collaborator Author

A first set of filters is implemented, and it is oda-realted. Same approach can be used for all-renku ones.

image

@volodymyrss
Copy link
Member

is this done?

@burnout87
Copy link
Collaborator Author

not really, I still have to integrate inside a dedicated config file

@burnout87
Copy link
Collaborator Author

This is also configurable.

At the moment, it allows to filter out subset of nodes belonging to a specific group (eg astroquery-related, as it is now).
It is also configurable with a dedicated json file

nodes_subset_filtering.webm

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants