Skip to content

Need to explain better the output values #118

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
ferrigno opened this issue Sep 3, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Need to explain better the output values #118

ferrigno opened this issue Sep 3, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Comments

@ferrigno
Copy link
Contributor

ferrigno commented Sep 3, 2024

I am going to edit the description since it is not referring to libraries correctly. @ferrigno , if you want to pose a legitimate question but do not know the implementation details, I'd say it's better not to guess but specify your point accurately, and leave implementation details for discussion.

As I see the use case issue, it is that @ferrigno wants more details on output types. I agree that it's good to expand the example repository and also add a section in the manual about these examples, with screenshots.

How does that sound to you, @ferrigno ?

I will leave the original content for the reference.

To exploit the functionalities of the frontend tab generator, it is important to use the oda_api.data_product especially for fits files and numpy tables. It is necessary to expand the documentation on this part.
Also the running with nb2workflow.run requires output to be formatted using data_products

@ferrigno ferrigno added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Sep 3, 2024
@ferrigno ferrigno self-assigned this Sep 3, 2024
@volodymyrss
Copy link
Member

@ferrigno , https://github.com/oda-hub/frontend-tab-generator/ has pretty much nothing to do with output product types.

Anyway, please have a look in the example repository and propose a change to the doc if you want.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants