Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Idea: Moving the config to snowfall #326

Open
Svenum opened this issue Aug 18, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Idea: Moving the config to snowfall #326

Svenum opened this issue Aug 18, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@Svenum
Copy link

Svenum commented Aug 18, 2024

I love the snowfall project, witch allows you to write a much cleaner, simpler and more understandable nix config. I use it in a lot of projects and I think it would made this one much easier to understand, so that more people can read the code and contribute to it.

I could lead this transition, but I would first know what do you think about this idea bevor I put a lot of afford in it and no one wants it. :)

So let me know what do you think about that.

Maybe we could try this in a branch first and check if its good or not, if you are unsure.

Some examples of my Projects:

@HeitorAugustoLN
Copy link
Member

I am uncertain whether using a highly opinionated library like Snowfall would be good for the project. While it may make the flake cleaner, it basically creates an abstraction of what is going under the hood of the flake.

@magnouvean
Copy link
Collaborator

I do sort of agree with @HeitorAugustoLN as well. I also think that plasma-manager should resemble home-manager as much as possible, which I'm unsure if building on top of snowfall would achieve.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants