Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Somehow group the multipart suggestions in Neovim. #515

Open
voronind-com opened this issue May 30, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Somehow group the multipart suggestions in Neovim. #515

voronind-com opened this issue May 30, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@voronind-com
Copy link

voronind-com commented May 30, 2024

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Right now multipart suggestions get split over multiple lines like this:
image
Here you can see the lines no. 3, 19 and 25 are all related to the same suggestion about escaping with keyword. However, in a situation where I'd get other suggestions in between them, it'd get really confusing.

Describe the solution you'd like
Simplest solution would be to prefix them like this:

Issue A-3: variable will bind to this definition.

Issue A-2: escaping this with expression.

Issue A-1: this variable will escape nested with, binding to static name.

Where A means the prefixed issue in this file (A, B, C etc) and number means the order to read? Or without the order.

Additional context
Neovim 0.10.0

@voronind-com voronind-com changed the title Somehow go [edit in progress, sorry] Somehow group the multipart suggestions in Neovim. May 30, 2024
@inclyc inclyc added the enhancement New feature or request label May 30, 2024
@voronind-com voronind-com changed the title [edit in progress, sorry] Somehow group the multipart suggestions in Neovim. Somehow group the multipart suggestions in Neovim. May 30, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants