Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CLI/API consistency and docs #54

Open
3 of 13 tasks
tomalrussell opened this issue Jul 25, 2023 · 0 comments
Open
3 of 13 tasks

CLI/API consistency and docs #54

tomalrussell opened this issue Jul 25, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@tomalrussell
Copy link
Member

tomalrussell commented Jul 25, 2023

General notes on high-level API and command-line interface consistency:

  • file format - allow either geo (geopandas.read_file,to_file) or parquet both input and output
  • snail split and snail process should consistently specify output file name
  • both should be able to handle more than one band (or document limitation)
  • handle reading specific layers from vector file
  • add option to process all layers in a layered vector file
  • add examples to README and docs
  • document that snail process calculates all features intersected with all rasters - one features CSV row creates one output file with columns for each raster file/band
  • attribute column names in output
  • split_linestrings should check for MultiLineString and either throw error or coerce (df.explode)
  • check where CRS assumptions must hold! e.g. it should be okay to overlay_raster at the top level and implicitly do reprojections if vector/raster CRSs don't match.
  • apply_indices should be done inside split_linestrings
  • name high-level functions overlay_raster[s] to take (features, raster dataset) and return (split features with attributed data)
  • avoid need for output_path column - if not present, name it like "{feature_filename}_{feature_layer}__{rasters_filename}"
@tomalrussell tomalrussell pinned this issue Jun 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant