Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SMPL-H vs SMPL Shape Parameters #35

Open
kidkych opened this issue Apr 1, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

SMPL-H vs SMPL Shape Parameters #35

kidkych opened this issue Apr 1, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@kidkych
Copy link

kidkych commented Apr 1, 2022

Hello, I've read that the SMPL-H and SMPL shape parameters are equivalent; I've also seen that for both cases the betas come in sizes of 10 or 16. Since the betas represent a PCA space, would it be correct to grab the first 10 elements from AMASS datasets that provide 16 beta parameters when we are using a SMPL model with just 10?

@dmanche03
Copy link

I know it's been quite some time since this, but do you know if it worked? I have the same issue but with the 'poses' parameter. I'm trying to use the data to synthesize virtual accelerations using the SMPL model instead of SMPLH, so the length of the vector containing the poses should be 72 (3 angles * 24 joints) instead of 165 (3 * 55). I've tried shortening the vector and keeping the first 72 values but it doesn't seem to work.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants