Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Not/Negative-Filter #1877

Open
Dubidubiduu opened this issue May 13, 2020 · 5 comments
Open

Add Not/Negative-Filter #1877

Dubidubiduu opened this issue May 13, 2020 · 5 comments

Comments

@Dubidubiduu
Copy link
Contributor

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I just want to know which is high priority and not done yet. Or I want to filter by "in edit" which aren't mine and also not from user x.

Describe the solution you'd like
Giving a Not filter for ppl and tags.

Describe alternatives you've considered
Workarounds as user:
A) Moving due-date and use existing due-filter. But then I lose information of the original due-date.
B) Instantly archive cards that are done. But I just want to see what we have archived for a time before archiving these...

Additional context
Guess it should be a second checkbox right next to the positive filter.

@juliusknorr
Copy link
Member

Any suggestions how this can be done from the user interface point of view? If we add such advanced filtering options we need to make sure this is obvious and doesn't add to much clutter to the filter view.

@Dubidubiduu
Copy link
Contributor Author

Dubidubiduu commented May 26, 2020

I thought of something like this, just imagine these activities are users or labels. Description of those rows would be True/False or Positive/Negative. Guess it would be neccessary to shrunk some white space.

aktivitaet

@Spartachetto
Copy link

Tris proposal could be related to nextcloud/server#4851

That one is the same proposal for tags.
You could:

  • pick some proposed solutions from that other issue
  • try to see if an unified approach is possible

Thanks in advance!

@juliusknorr
Copy link
Member

I'm not sure about adding such advanced options UI wise as this will make the interface a lot more complicated. As an alternative we could think about adding and or operators to possible search queries #286

@juliusknorr
Copy link
Member

cc @nextcloud/designers

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants