You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, I'm using the processed_eda function to extract feature from the raw eda in my research. However, I found that there were some NaNs in the "processed_eda['EDA']['SCR_Recovery_Indexes']". Why these NaNs appear? And how should I deal with these NaNs to get the final feature such as mean of recovery times in your suggestion?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@chongluyao It seems that currently, Recovery is having NA if there is no peak onset in the selected SCR window. However, by looking at it superficially, I'm not sure this is needed. It could potentially be refactored to something a little bit better. I'll try to have a look at it when I'll have some time.
This does not prevent you from computing the means though, sometimes it's better to compute a feature based on few, but clean observations than from noisy and artefacted data.
Hi, I'm using the processed_eda function to extract feature from the raw eda in my research. However, I found that there were some NaNs in the "processed_eda['EDA']['SCR_Recovery_Indexes']". Why these NaNs appear? And how should I deal with these NaNs to get the final feature such as mean of recovery times in your suggestion?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: