-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
differences between cyclegan and discogan #1
Comments
Hey, about the first point, isn't the single cycle-consistency loss defined as a sum of the two forward cycle-consistent loss and backward cycle-consistent loss just as in DiscoGAN? |
@yash2208 yes, exactly. cyclegan uses one cycle-consistency losses by adding up the losses from each domain transfer generator (Gab + Gba) with multiplication of scale factor gamma (10 in the paper.), while DIscoGAN uses each losses respectively without summation. |
The differences between 2 papers seem not enough to split them into 2 papers. I think they were submitted at quite the same time so they both got published. However, CycleGAN seems got more attention. |
(https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-difference-between-CycleGAN-and-DiscoGAN-They-both-seem-to-be-the-same-thing)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: