Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Multiplex websocket #85

Open
SajjadPourali opened this issue Dec 15, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Multiplex websocket #85

SajjadPourali opened this issue Dec 15, 2023 · 0 comments
Assignees
@SajjadPourali
Labels
A-agent Area: client A-client Area: client A-gateway Area: Gateway C-feature Category: feature. This is adding a new feature. C-performance Category: performance. This is making existing behavior go faster. E-medium Effort: medium. Some knowledge of how narrowlink internal works would be useful.
Milestone
0.3.0

Comments

@SajjadPourali
Copy link
Contributor

Implement a multiplex protocol to share a WebSocket stream among different connections, reducing the currently opened sockets.
@SajjadPourali SajjadPourali self-assigned this Dec 15, 2023
@SajjadPourali SajjadPourali added C-feature Category: feature. This is adding a new feature. E-medium Effort: medium. Some knowledge of how narrowlink internal works would be useful. A-gateway Area: Gateway A-client Area: client A-agent Area: client C-performance Category: performance. This is making existing behavior go faster. labels Dec 15, 2023
@SajjadPourali SajjadPourali added this to the 0.3.0 milestone Dec 15, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@SajjadPourali SajjadPourali

Labels
A-agent Area: client A-client Area: client A-gateway Area: Gateway C-feature Category: feature. This is adding a new feature. C-performance Category: performance. This is making existing behavior go faster. E-medium Effort: medium. Some knowledge of how narrowlink internal works would be useful.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
0.3.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@SajjadPourali