Replies: 1 comment
-
|
Thank you @twarnick for the feedback. I agree that we want to turn this into a list, this would also make it easier to understand. I also see the issue with perl modules. This is caused by the fact that we detect perl-modules-5.28 by its origin. But the updated perl-base will replace the per-modules package, so we probably want to exclude the dependent package. This does not work in all cases since sometimes only partial packages are installed. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi,
there is an advisory for perl on debian bookworm DSA-5902-1.
First:

The suggested script can't work correctly, because the line with the package names, must be a list and then iterated.
Second:

the second package name perl-modules-5.28=5.36.0-7+deb12u2 can't be found and does not exist on the debian repo.
It should be: perl-modules-5.36 ??
@atomic111 - thank for the github invitation :)
Regards,
Thomas
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions