-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 643
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Unexpected error "Сannot finalize the creation of a node that is already dead" while applying snapshot #2136
Comments
I think this may be a docs and TypeScript issue. You're calling You can see it working here: https://codesandbox.io/p/sandbox/issue-2136-7hpyd2?file=%2Fsrc%2Findex.ts%3A21%2C3 But there's TypeScript errors on those actions. Here's the working code for posterity: import { types, applySnapshot } from "mobx-state-tree";
const Model = types.array(
types.model({
b: types.string,
c: types.optional(
types.model({
d: types.snapshotProcessor(types.model({ e: "" }), {
// TypeScript errors here, but I think that's incorrect
preProcess(snapshot: { e: string }) {
return { e: snapshot.e };
},
// TypeScript errors here, but I think that's incorrect
postProcess(snapshot: { e: string }) {
return snapshot.e;
},
}),
}),
{ d: { e: "e" } }
),
})
);
const m = Model.create([{ b: "b" }]);
applySnapshot(m, []); I'll tag this, and please accept our apologies for the bug! We'll close this issue when we fix the types, but please let me know if I've missed anything else. |
@coolsoftwaretyler In your version |
Ah, my bad! I had a false positive, was just getting those errors to go away. There is a documentation issue. We call it I'll remove the TypeScript label here. I've been messing around with the code and I think this is coming from |
Seems to be related to applying the snapshot as an empty array. I can get the processed snapshot, modify it in place, and apply it correctly: import { types, applySnapshot, getSnapshot } from "mobx-state-tree";
const Model = types.array(
types.model({
b: types.string,
c: types.optional(
types.model({
d: types.snapshotProcessor(types.model({ e: "" }), {
preProcessor(snapshot: { e: string }) {
return { e: snapshot.e };
},
postProcessor(snapshot: { e: string }, node) {
return {
...snapshot,
e: "modified",
};
},
}),
}),
{ d: { e: "e" } }
),
})
);
const m = Model.create([{ b: "b" }]);
const snapshot = getSnapshot(m);
console.log("snapshot", snapshot);
const modifiedSnapshot = [...snapshot];
console.log("modifiedSnapshot", modifiedSnapshot);
modifiedSnapshot[0].c.d.e = "modifiedAgain";
applySnapshot(m, modifiedSnapshot);
console.log("snapshot one last time", getSnapshot(m)); Updated example there: https://codesandbox.io/p/sandbox/issue-2136-7hpyd2?file=%2Fsrc%2Findex.ts%3A41%2C1 But if you try to apply as an empty array, the error comes back. |
Whoops, getting used to the new CodeSandbox tools. This should work: https://codesandbox.io/p/sandbox/issue-2136-7hpyd2?file=%2Fsrc%2Findex.ts%3A41%2C1 |
I've got some pass-by-reference errors in there, but I gotta run at the moment so I can revisit this later. Sorry 'bout that! |
It's not related with an empty array, following code throws the same error: const Model = types.array(
types.model({
b: types.string,
c: types.optional(
types.model({
d: types.snapshotProcessor(types.model({ e: '' }), {
preProcessor(e: string) {
return { e };
},
postProcessor(snapshot) {
return snapshot.e;
}
})
}),
{ d: 'e' }
)
})
);
const m = Model.create([{ b: 'b' }, { b: 'bb' }]);
applySnapshot(m, [{ b: 'b' }]); // error Interestingly, if I remove const Model = types.array(
types.model({
b: types.string,
c:
types.model({
d: types.snapshotProcessor(types.model({ e: '' }), {
preProcessor(e: string) {
return { e };
},
postProcessor(snapshot) {
return snapshot.e;
}
})
})
})
);
const m = Model.create([{ b: 'b', c: { d: '' } }, { b: 'bb', c: { d: '' } }]);
applySnapshot(m, [{ b: 'b', c: { d: '' } }]); |
Interesting. Maybe |
Hopefully it's just this: #2137 Once we get a test in there I can merge and deploy a patch, probably early this week. |
Unfortunately, no ( |
Ah dang. Do you have the full text of the exception with that patched? That might be helpful |
Thank you! I'll see if I can get anyone to investigate. If not, I can at some point in the coming weeks. Would welcome a PR if you trace the error on your own as well. Apologies for the inconvenience! |
Hi, @coolsoftwaretyler! Is there any progress? |
Sorry, not yet! Haven't had anyone volunteer to work on it. |
@coolsoftwaretyler I have the same problem, it starts with 5.4.0 |
Thanks @BohdanPylypchuk. Still haven't had anyone volunteer to work on it, we would welcome assistance! |
Bug report
Sandbox link or minimal reproduction code
Describe the expected behavior
Should work without any errors
Describe the observed behavior
Error: [mobx-state-tree] assertion failed: cannot finalize the creation of a node that is already dead
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: