Replies: 2 comments
-
Hi Vicente, Sincerely, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Thanks so much for your prompt response! Indeed, that's the protocol we use and I think you've clarified my questions. Thanks again! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hi,
We implemented your RNA-based 5'-RACE protocol with UMIs. For a long time, we have been using the full
MIGEC
workflow to preprocess the raw data, all the way fromCheckout
toFilterCdrBlastResults
. BecauseMIGEC
is not supported nowadays, we've decided to move on and implementMIXCR
for the preprocessing and downstream analyses of this type of data. I appreciate you've nicely added a preset for this type of data,milab-human-rna-tcr-umi-race
, though it doesn't look like it supports demultiplexing of TCR samples based on master and slave barcodes, essentially the process thatMIGEC Checkout
would do. Accordingly, I believe the following workflow should do for the analysis of this type of data:MIGEC Checkout
for TCR sample demultiplexing, dropping the-u
option to avoid UMI extraction.MIXCR
with themilab-human-rna-tcr-umi-race
preset applied to each properly demultiplexed TCR sample.Do you spot any potential issues with this general workflow? Do you have any specific recommendations?
Last but not least, thanks so much for the development of such wonderful toolkits for the analysis of immune repertoires and thanks in advance for your kind input!
Sincerely,
Vicente
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions