Fix accessibility warnings

[pelikhan]

See vscode-elements issues

[github-actions]

Accessibility is a critical aspect of software development, ensuring that all users, including those with disabilities, can use and interact with applications seamlessly. The title "Fix accessibility warnings" highlights an important task but lacks specific details on what exactly needs to be addressed or what type of issues are being referenced.

To effectively review this issue, it would be helpful to:

1. Identify the specific accessibility warnings that need to be fixed.
2. Determine if there's a particular component or feature within vscode-elements causing these issues.
3. Outline the expected outcomes or criteria for what constitutes a fix.
4. Consider any potential impact on other parts of the codebase.

Given the information provided, it seems the task is somewhat vague. To proceed with a meaningful review, more details should be included in the issue description. Here’s an example of how the issue could be clarified:

---

Title: Fix accessibility warnings related to vscode-elements component

Body:

There are several accessibility warnings reported by the Lighthouse audit tool for our application. Specifically, issues are being flagged in the vscode-elements components.

Steps to Reproduce

1. Run Lighthouse audit on our application.
2. Observe the accessibility warnings related to vscode-elements.
3. Identify specific issues such as missing ARIA attributes, focus management problems, or color contrast issues.

Expected Outcomes

• Resolve all identified accessibility issues in the vscode-elements components.
• Ensure that the application passes Lighthouse accessibility audits without any failures or warnings for vscode-elements.

Additional Information

• The current Lighthouse report can be found at [link to Lighthouse report].
• Any relevant code snippets or screenshots from the Lighthouse audit are attached below.

---

With this more detailed issue description, reviewers and developers will have a clearer understanding of what needs to be addressed, ensuring a more efficient review process.

AI-generated content by issue-reviewer may be incorrect