-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 345
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Detailed hardware comparison table #1036
Comments
What is the biggest challenge to model comparison with the current layout? |
The biggest challenge is that you can't filter or sort. With a unified table you could at least copy it to Excel or Google sheets and filter for stuff like flash or PSRAM or GPS functionality. |
Interesting. There was a push to implement a filtered search feature for hardware selection based on: It proved to be too complex for me to implement. Perhaps that would be a more appropriate feature request? I wouldn't assume users would copy to excel to sort the options. Another request could be a downloadable CSV of such a table. |
I would just use datatables with filters for this: https://datatables.net/extensions/fixedheader/examples/options/columnFiltering.html |
It would be really helpful to have a single "Table of Hardware" comparison at https://meshtastic.org/docs/hardware/devices/ showing information for all supported devices you can buy out of the box. The table should have additional fields that are important for choosing a model.
The current page makes it hard to compare different models and brands and misses important information like the amount of flash and PSRAM that are or might become relevant with newer firmware versions and functions e.g. Store and Forward or improved routing algorithms.
Here is what I have in mind:
Additional fields e.g. battery support, display resolution, availability, supported in current release might also be useful and can be added in the future.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: