You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As an idea it would be nice to have a possibility to configure coverage report directory instead of executing a test command. I think running tests multiple times because of coverage comment / annotations might cost more as well as take longer.
I think for now I can provide noop test command and put report in the cwd directory and it will work, but still it would be nice to have an explicit option for this case.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
svsool
changed the title
Possibility to not execute command and possibility to configure coverage report directory
Possibility to not execute command and configure coverage report directory
Aug 2, 2020
Hi,
As an idea it would be nice to have a possibility to configure coverage report directory instead of executing a test command. I think running tests multiple times because of coverage comment / annotations might cost more as well as take longer.
I think for now I can provide noop test command and put report in the cwd directory and it will work, but still it would be nice to have an explicit option for this case.
Here is a good example of parameters https://github.com/codecov/codecov-action this action can accept.
In one of my workflows I use directory parameter.
Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: