Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

setD_closed and setDI_closed #1225

Open
affeldt-aist opened this issue May 20, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

setD_closed and setDI_closed #1225

affeldt-aist opened this issue May 20, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
renaming/refactoring 🔧 This is about a renaming or refactoring in the library
Milestone
1.4.0

Comments

@affeldt-aist
Copy link
Member

measure.v defines the following:

Definition setD_closed := forall A B, B `<=` A -> G A -> G B -> G (A `\` B).
Definition setDI_closed := forall A B, G A -> G B -> G (A `\` B).

Isn't setDI_closed weird since the definition does not use setI?
Shouldn't it be setD_closed.
Then, what about renaming the now-old setD_closed to setSD_closed (with S for subset)?
@affeldt-aist affeldt-aist added the renaming/refactoring 🔧 This is about a renaming or refactoring in the library label May 20, 2024
@affeldt-aist affeldt-aist added this to the 1.3.0 milestone May 20, 2024
@affeldt-aist affeldt-aist modified the milestones: 1.3.0, 1.4.0 Jun 17, 2024
@affeldt-aist affeldt-aist mentioned this issue Jun 17, 2024
Open
2 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
renaming/refactoring 🔧 This is about a renaming or refactoring in the library
Projects
None yet
Milestone
1.4.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@affeldt-aist