-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add GNS XPEHH #26
Comments
Should I make a new release or update RC2? |
I'd say update RC2, it's just adding data, nothing is changed.
…On Monday, January 29, 2018, Nick Harding ***@***.***> wrote:
Should I make a new release or update RC2?
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#26 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAq8QrV6wu9fKAXIH3jGfNINnY1Mucn3ks5tPa8EgaJpZM4Rl1GE>
.
--
Alistair Miles
Head of Epidemiological Informatics
Centre for Genomics and Global Health <http://cggh.org>
Big Data Institute Building
Old Road Campus
Roosevelt Drive
Oxford
OX3 7LF
United Kingdom
Phone: +44 (0)1865 743596
Email: [email protected]
Web: http://a <http://purl.org/net/aliman>limanfoo.github.io/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/alimanfoo
|
Also- I should add XPCLR / TjD for GNS, and also XPCLR for populations that are never present as a focal population (just GNS I think). |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
The site currently has GNS scans for H12 and IHS, but there were no GNS comparison in the raw XPEHH set. If we want to be able to compare the number of signals per population including Guinea, we should add XPEHH for GNS (probably using same comparisons as BFS).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: