You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: mod_facilitation.qmd
+5-5Lines changed: 5 additions & 5 deletions
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ As we learned earlier in the course, people have different thinking preferences
137
137
<imgsrc="images/figure_thinking-style-expects.png"alt="Circle divided into same quadrants as previous image where each quadrant contains the expectations and enjoyments of that thinking style. Top left expects clear/concise info, well articulated ideas, accuracy, and certainty and enjoys a good debate, critical analysis, and readings. Top right expects an overview, a conceptual framework, freedom to explore, analogies/metaphors, and visuals and enjoys initiative and imagination, connections to other approaches, newness and 'fun'. Bottom right expects involvement with others, personal anecdotes, experimental approach, and feelings to be considered and enjoys the personal touch, group discussion and harmony. Bottom left expects step-by-step unfolding, detailed program, punctuality, and an explanation of how and enjoys a structured approach, low risk, and concrete examples"width="70%"/>
@@ -158,15 +158,15 @@ Now consider the expectations and preferences of the other thinking styles noted
158
158
159
159
### Tool Highlight: Collaborative Whiteboards
160
160
161
-
**Collaborative whiteboards** are useful tools for capturing ideas from a group during virtual meetings. They range from simple (EasyRetro, Zoom's whiteboard function) to complex (Mural, miro). Benefits include simultaneous input, the ability to organize information into discrete, movable chunks, and the visual nature of the output.
161
+
**Collaborative whiteboards** are useful tools for capturing ideas from a group during virtual meetings. They range from simple (EasyRetro, Zoom's whiteboard function) to complex (Mural, miro). Benefits include simultaneous input, the ability to organize information into discrete, movable chunks, and the visual (and lasting) nature of the output.
162
162
163
163
## Ensuring Equitable Access to Participation
164
164
165
-
To tap diverse perspectives and catalyze productivity and creative problem-solving, we need to design meetings (and projects) so <u>everyone</u> can participate fully, rather than just a few. When tackling complex challenges, voices from the edge are often critical to uncovering new insights and innovative approaches. Democratizing participation doesn't have to be all about controlling the dominant voices in a group; with careful planning and some simple tools, you can design any conversation so that everyone can contribute.
165
+
To tap diverse perspectives and catalyze productivity and creative problem-solving, we need to design meetings (and projects) so <u>everyone</u> can participate fully, rather than just a few. When tackling complex challenges, voices from the edge are often critical to uncovering new insights and approaches. Democratizing participation doesn't have to be all about controlling the dominant voices in a group; with careful planning and some simple tools, you can design any conversation so that everyone can contribute.
166
166
167
167
A few simple techniques can help:
168
168
169
-
1. Mix up the format, e.g., combining silent reflection, round robin, breakout groups, plenary, and/or liberating structures (more on these below)
169
+
1. Mix up the format, e.g., combining silent reflection, round robin, breakout groups, plenary, and/or "liberating structures" (more on these below)
170
170
2. Offer different channels for information sharing - verbal, nonverbal, written, visual, informal, formal
171
171
3. Track and stack who wants to speak
172
172
4. Invite, amplify, and credit "quieter" voices
@@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ Good meeting design starts with understanding your purpose and objectives, as we
186
186
187
187
A good rule of thumb is to allow 2-3x as much time to plan a meeting as its duration.
188
188
189
-
<p align="center"
189
+
<palign="center">
190
190
<imgsrc="images/figure_meeting-design-questions.png"alt="Figure separating meeting planning into 'why, what, how, and who' facets"width="95%"/>
0 commit comments