lsstdarkmatter
diff --git a/‎figures/dmbaryon_pk2.png
23.6 KB b/‎figures/dmbaryon_pk2.png
23.6 KB
diff --git a/‎models/particles.tex
Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion b/‎models/particles.tex
Lines changed: 1 addition & 1 deletion
@@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ \subsection{Baryon-Scattering Dark Matter (BSDM) \Contact{Vera}}
 
 \begin{figure}
 \centering
-\includegraphics[width=0.6\columnwidth]{figures/dmbaryon_pk.png}
+\includegraphics[width=0.6\columnwidth]{figures/dmbaryon_pk2.png}.png}
 \caption{Linear matter power spectrum at $z=0$. We show the residuals between the CDM case and the case where there is velocity-independent spin-independent scattering between dark matter and protons. The dark matter particle mass is set to 1 MeV, and all other cosmological parameters are set to their best-fit Planck 2015 values \citep{Ade:2015xua}. Different residual curves display cutoffs at different angular scales, controlled by the magnitude of the interaction cross section. The highest cross section shown corresponds to the current 95\% confidence-level upper limit inferred from analyses of CMB data \citep{Gluscevic:2017ywp,Boddy:2018kfv}.
 \ADW{I think we need a better version of this figure.}
 }
Original file line number	Diff line number	Diff line change
`@@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ \subsection{Baryon-Scattering Dark Matter (BSDM) \Contact{Vera}}`
`152`	`152`
`153`	`153`	`\begin{figure}`
`154`	`154`	`\centering`
`155`		`-\includegraphics[width=0.6\columnwidth]{figures/dmbaryon_pk.png}`
	`155`	`+\includegraphics[width=0.6\columnwidth]{figures/dmbaryon_pk2.png}.png}`
`156`	`156`	\caption{Linear matter power spectrum at $z=0$. We show the residuals between the CDM case and the case where there is velocity-independent spin-independent scattering between dark matter and protons. The dark matter particle mass is set to 1 MeV, and all other cosmological parameters are set to their best-fit Planck 2015 values \citep{Ade:2015xua}. Different residual curves display cutoffs at different angular scales, controlled by the magnitude of the interaction cross section. The highest cross section shown corresponds to the current 95\% confidence-level upper limit inferred from analyses of CMB data \citep{Gluscevic:2017ywp,Boddy:2018kfv}.
`157`	`157`	`\ADW{I think we need a better version of this figure.}`
`158`	`158`	`}`