Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Possible annotation schema additions #9

Open
genghisken opened this issue Nov 25, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Possible annotation schema additions #9

genghisken opened this issue Nov 25, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@genghisken
Copy link
Collaborator

Just raising this for discussion. We've discussed verbally but would be good to write down so we have a record. Also this shows that we spent time doing this, even if the request is ultimately rejected.

  • Our users (fastfinder) wanted to know if we could have a (default null) "summary score" (float) and a "summary score uncertainty" (float) column in the main annotations table to allow indexed selection from the main table. These values can be buried as JSON key/value pairs in the classdict column, but the complex regex required to search it will slow down the SQL query. One issue that we could see is that annotators like 4MOST might want to stick the redshift somewhere that's not buried in the classdict column (e.g. so we can immediately grab all the SN Ia transients within a certain volume). Could re-use summary scores/uncertainties, or have yet another column for redshift (and/or host redshift).
  • We also discussed that IF Annotators were have common high classification categories (e.g. KN, SN Ia, etc) could we get them to agree on a common transient label (e.g. as defined by TNS).
@RoyWilliams RoyWilliams transferred this issue from lsst-uk/ARCHIVE-lasair-lsst May 18, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant