You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Three bitmanip instructions seem to be missing coverage, orc.b, zext.h and rev8. They are being executed but they can be interpreted as pseudo-instruction forms of more general instructions or instructions in their own right depending on what bitmanip implementation you are using.
We should consider reworking our coverage collection to ensure executing these samples both the pseudo instruction form and the general instruction form (so it works with configs that don't have the general instruction form).
In the case of zext.h we don't implement the more general pack it uses but have to emit it in that form from the Ibex tracer due to LLVM/GCC tooling issues, see #1228
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Three bitmanip instructions seem to be missing coverage,
orc.b
,zext.h
andrev8
. They are being executed but they can be interpreted as pseudo-instruction forms of more general instructions or instructions in their own right depending on what bitmanip implementation you are using.We should consider reworking our coverage collection to ensure executing these samples both the pseudo instruction form and the general instruction form (so it works with configs that don't have the general instruction form).
In the case of
zext.h
we don't implement the more generalpack
it uses but have to emit it in that form from the Ibex tracer due to LLVM/GCC tooling issues, see #1228The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: