You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The paper referencing this code mentions that
X2 = spriorT B-1 sprior + zT R-1 z
is distributed as a χ2 variable on ν = Nobservations + Nfluxes. This is true.
The paper then goes on to generate an ensemble of pseudo-observations, calculate X2/ν for each member, and states that the expected value of this latter quantity is one. This is also true.
The difficulty I am having is that I can decompose X2 into two random variables:
Xflux2 = spriorT B-1 sprior
and
Xobs2 = zT R-1 z,
which are distributed as χ2 variables on Nfluxes and Nobservations, respectively. The ensemble in the paper generates multiple realizations of the second variable, but I only see one realization of the first.
E(X2 / ν) is still one;
E(E(X2 | Xflux2)) is also one;
E(X2 | Xflux2) is a function of Xflux2 and is what I think the paper has.
Is this an accurate description of what is going on? Is this a known and intended behavior of this package? It is entirely possible I just missed this section of the paper while reading. If that is th case, a pointer to the section of the paper where this is described would be welcome.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The paper referencing this code mentions that
X2 = spriorT B-1 sprior + zT R-1 z
is distributed as a χ2 variable on ν = Nobservations + Nfluxes. This is true.
The paper then goes on to generate an ensemble of pseudo-observations, calculate X2/ν for each member, and states that the expected value of this latter quantity is one. This is also true.
The difficulty I am having is that I can decompose X2 into two random variables:
Xflux2 = spriorT B-1 sprior
and
Xobs2 = zT R-1 z,
which are distributed as χ2 variables on Nfluxes and Nobservations, respectively. The ensemble in the paper generates multiple realizations of the second variable, but I only see one realization of the first.
E(X2 / ν) is still one;
E(E(X2 | Xflux2)) is also one;
E(X2 | Xflux2) is a function of Xflux2 and is what I think the paper has.
Is this an accurate description of what is going on? Is this a known and intended behavior of this package? It is entirely possible I just missed this section of the paper while reading. If that is th case, a pointer to the section of the paper where this is described would be welcome.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: