You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently through our code we have references to opcode and opCode, in both internal var names and error types.
This inconstency should be address before releasing v2, to prevent it become annoying and introducing the need for either accepting inconsistent behaviour, or releasing a breaking change.
I am personally going to argue for opcode and Opcode to be used, instead of opCode and OpCode, as in written English it is only one word and officially written as opcode.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently through our code we have references to
opcode
andopCode
, in both internal var names and error types.This inconstency should be address before releasing v2, to prevent it become annoying and introducing the need for either accepting inconsistent behaviour, or releasing a breaking change.
I am personally going to argue for
opcode
andOpcode
to be used, instead ofopCode
andOpCode
, as in written English it is only one word and officially written asopcode
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: