libressl 4.0.0 build failed on mips: crypto_arch.h: No such file or directory

[abcfy2]

Here's the full log of build: https://github.com/abcfy2/aria2-static-build/actions/runs/11342690751/job/31543660613

The reason is:

cp ../../include/arch/mips/opensslconf.h opensslconf.h
make  all-am
make[3]: Entering directory '/usr/src/libressl-4.0.0/include/openssl'
make[3]: Nothing to be done for 'all-am'.
make[3]: Leaving directory '/usr/src/libressl-4.0.0/include/openssl'
make[2]: Leaving directory '/usr/src/libressl-4.0.0/include/openssl'
make[2]: Entering directory '/usr/src/libressl-4.0.0/include'
make[2]: Nothing to be done for 'all-am'.
make[2]: Leaving directory '/usr/src/libressl-4.0.0/include'
make[1]: Leaving directory '/usr/src/libressl-4.0.0/include'
Making all in crypto
make[1]: Entering directory '/usr/src/libressl-4.0.0/crypto'
echo "generating crypto_portable.sym ..."
generating crypto_portable.sym ...
cp ../crypto/crypto.sym crypto_portable.sym
chmod u+w crypto_portable.sym
make  all-am
make[2]: Entering directory '/usr/src/libressl-4.0.0/crypto'
  CC       libcrypto_la-cpt_err.lo
  CC       libcrypto_la-crypto_ex_data.lo
  CC       libcrypto_la-crypto_init.lo
  CC       libcrypto_la-cryptlib.lo
  CC       libcrypto_la-crypto_lock.lo
In file included from crypto_lock.c:22:
crypto_internal.h:23:10: fatal error: crypto_arch.h: No such file or directory
   23 | #include "crypto_arch.h"
      |          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
compilation terminated.
  CC       libcrypto_la-cversion.lo
make[2]: *** [Makefile:4714: libcrypto_la-crypto_lock.lo] Error 1
make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
make[2]: Leaving directory '/usr/src/libressl-4.0.0/crypto'
make[1]: *** [Makefile:1953: all] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory '/usr/src/libressl-4.0.0/crypto'
make: *** [Makefile:460: all-recursive] Error 1

[botovq]

That's a 32-bit mips build, right? In that case, see #1082. If not, we should fix this.

We should probably look into erroring out earlier if people attempt to build this.

[abcfy2]

That's a 32-bit mips build, right? In that case, see #1082. If not, we should fix this.

We should probably look into erroring out earlier if people attempt to build this.

Yes. It's 32-bit mips. I use this toolchain for cross compile: http://musl.cc/

Today there're some routers may still use mips arch.

[botovq]

Thanks. Yes, I'm aware that the architecture is still in use. As mentioned in the other thread, I'm not against supporting it, but it kind of worked by accident so far. We need someone to step up and own this platform. Otherwise it's simply out of scope for now.

As mentioned in the ChangeLog for 4.0.0: "The mips32 platform is no longer actively supported."

I'll look into making this clearer earlier in the build system.

[hiirotsuki]

v4.0.0 builds and all tests (except year2038) pass on my 32-bit mipsel board w/ debian. Isn't this just about whether or not an architecture has assembly implementations for certain bits?