Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow users to send to contract addresses as well as stacks addresses #6107

Open
314159265359879 opened this issue Feb 11, 2025 · 5 comments
Labels
enhancement enhancement-p4 Non-critical functionality wanted by few users, or there are clear alternatives

Comments

@314159265359879
Copy link
Contributor

When a user adds a contract address to the "address" field it says "invalid address", technically it is a valid principle and we could allow this.

When a user adds a contract address we could show a warning, to make sure it is their intention. If a contract does not have functions to get the tokens out they could be stuck forever.

Image

Workaround: use the cli to send tokens to the contract instead.

@314159265359879 314159265359879 added enhancement enhancement-p4 Non-critical functionality wanted by few users, or there are clear alternatives labels Feb 11, 2025
Copy link

linear bot commented Feb 11, 2025

@314159265359879
Copy link
Contributor Author

A dev requested this feature for testing purposes:

Image

@pete-watters
Copy link
Contributor

@314159265359879 - I can take a look at this. We have a thread for it here. Can you confirm that the format is ${STACKS_ADDRESS}.counter or can the last part be contract dependant?

@pete-watters pete-watters self-assigned this Feb 12, 2025
@markmhendrickson
Copy link
Collaborator

Dupe for reference: #3011

@pete-watters
Copy link
Contributor

@pradel opened an issue for this with Hiro Explorer also as the same thing happens there:
hirosystems/explorer#1913

@camerow camerow added the cooldown label Feb 24, 2025 — with Linear
@pete-watters pete-watters removed their assignment Feb 25, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement enhancement-p4 Non-critical functionality wanted by few users, or there are clear alternatives
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants