Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support for Istio prometheusMerge #1468

Open
a-thaler opened this issue Sep 23, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Support for Istio prometheusMerge #1468

a-thaler opened this issue Sep 23, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
area/metrics MetricPipeline kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature.

Comments

@a-thaler
Copy link
Collaborator

Description
Dynatrace metric integration is cumbersome with metrics as there is not the best fitting solution available. Either the user disabled istio mTLS for the metric ports and uses dynatrace annotations, or he uses the telemetry module to push data via OTLP to Dynatrace, but hear so many conversion is needed that it is troublefull as well, also see https://kyma-project.io/#/telemetry-manager/user/integration/dynatrace/README?id=ingest-metrics

It turned out that there is another alternative to the direct Dynatrace integration scenario which does not require an explicit disabling of the TLS mode for the whole port. By enabling the prometheusMerge feature of Istio, the envoys will expose a new port which serves the envoy metrics plus the business metrics (configured via prometheus pod annotation). With that, Dynatrace can scrape all the metrics directly without reducing the TLS setting on the original port. However, the metric data will be transported plain text.

While that solution sounds better then the current integration scenario, it will affect the current telemetry functionality heavily, as suddenly all pods will have prometheus annotations and will be detected by the telemetry prometheus input. And all this pods will mainly return envoy metrics.

Goal
Understand all the implications of the feature and propose a concept on if the istio feature should be enabled always/optional and if something should be adjusted in the telemetry functionality.

Criterias

  • A new document is created in the internal docs folder which:
    • gives a clear proposal on if the istio feature should be enabled by default/optional
    • what kind of adjustments are needed on the telemetry functionality
@a-thaler a-thaler added kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. area/metrics MetricPipeline labels Sep 23, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/metrics MetricPipeline kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant