You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Description
Users like the way it is by getting a kind of managed agent support to easily start collecting telemetry data. The usual integration with CloudLogging seem to fit even from the requirement perspective, however, as soon as a custom output gets used, custom filters for LogPipelines are getting used. Also, often I wanted to recommend to filter out some metrics coming with the default setup, where such possibility is missing at the moment.
Requirements:
Have a way to enrich data with cluster specific data attributes
Have a way to filter out data which is not relevant for the use case
The support should be equivalent across all Otel based pipelines, using similar syntax and semantics
Idea:
All generic filter and transformation logic in otel-collector-contrib seem to get consolidated into one main processors, filterprocessor and transformprocessor, being both based on OTTL.
Provide support for these two processors, and all major needs in regards to filter and transform will be covered
Typical Use cases:
Add one cluster identifier resource attribute like for dynatrace
Come up with an API proposal
- Do you need to have multiple filter and transform rules with a flexible order, or is one block for each in a fixed order is enough?
- Can it be on root level or do we need an additional umbrella attribute "processors"?
Implementation
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Description
Users like the way it is by getting a kind of managed agent support to easily start collecting telemetry data. The usual integration with CloudLogging seem to fit even from the requirement perspective, however, as soon as a custom output gets used, custom filters for LogPipelines are getting used. Also, often I wanted to recommend to filter out some metrics coming with the default setup, where such possibility is missing at the moment.
Requirements:
Idea:
Typical Use cases:
Tasks:
- Do you need to have multiple filter and transform rules with a flexible order, or is one block for each in a fixed order is enough?
- Can it be on root level or do we need an additional umbrella attribute "processors"?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: