Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SC3045: Inconsistent policy #3058

Open
4 tasks done
mcandre opened this issue Sep 17, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
4 tasks done

SC3045: Inconsistent policy #3058

mcandre opened this issue Sep 17, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@mcandre
Copy link

mcandre commented Sep 17, 2024

For bugs

For new checks and feature suggestions

Here's a snippet or screenshot that shows the problem:

#!/bin/sh
LF='
'

find "$SOURCE" \
    -name '.DS_Store' -o -name 'Thumbs.db' -prune -o \
    -type f \
    -print |
    sort |
    xargs -n "$FILE_LIMIT" |
    while IFS= read -r "-d${LF}" fs; do
        TARGET="${PREFIX}-${I}"
        mkdir -p "$TARGET"

        for f in $fs; do
            cp "$f" "$TARGET"
        done

        I=$((I+1))
    done

Here's what shellcheck currently says:

    while IFS= read -r "-d${LF}" fs; do
                       ^-------^ SC3045 (warning): In POSIX sh, read -d is undefined.

Here's what I wanted or expected to see:

(No warning should be displayed.)

For comparison, the wiki does not document this flag as being non-POSIX compliant:

https://www.shellcheck.net/wiki/SC3045

In fact, the POSIX standard formally accepts -d:

https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9799919799/utilities/read.html

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant