You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In an FT8 project I’m working on, I’ve integrated an existing FT8 library and it’s almost plug-and-play. The main missing piece is ARRL Field Day (contest exchange) support (i3.n3 = 0.3/0.4). I plan to add it myself, so I’m opening this thread to discuss the expected message flow and any corner cases.
Some features are more a concern of the front end / UI layer, but I want to make sure the library itself is robust and protocol-correct.
Standard ARRL Field Day FT8 exchange (WSJT-X style)
(Grid intentionally omitted to avoid ambiguity with FD exchanges.)
t0: CQ FD AG6AQ
t1: AG6AQ W1AW 2F CT
t2: W1AW AG6AQ R 3A SCV
t3: AG6AQ W1AW RR73
t4: W1AW AG6AQ 73
I’d appreciate comments on:
whether the shortened flow is log-safe and commonly accepted,
whether using R 2F CT in t1 causes any decoder or auto-sequencing issues, and
any recommended handling for repeats or partial copy in an FD-specific state machine.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
In an FT8 project I’m working on, I’ve integrated an existing FT8 library and it’s almost plug-and-play. The main missing piece is ARRL Field Day (contest exchange) support (i3.n3 = 0.3/0.4). I plan to add it myself, so I’m opening this thread to discuss the expected message flow and any corner cases.
Some features are more a concern of the front end / UI layer, but I want to make sure the library itself is robust and protocol-correct.
Standard ARRL Field Day FT8 exchange (WSJT-X style)
(Grid intentionally omitted to avoid ambiguity with FD exchanges.)
t0: CQ FD AG6AQ
t1: AG6AQ W1AW 2F CT
t2: W1AW AG6AQ R 3A SCV
t3: AG6AQ W1AW RR73
t4: W1AW AG6AQ 73
Possible 1-slot shorter variant
t0: CQ FD AG6AQ 3A SCV
t1: AG6AQ W1AW 2F CT (or AG6AQ W1AW R 2F CT)
t2: W1AW AG6AQ RR73
t3: AG6AQ W1AW 73
I’d appreciate comments on:
whether the shortened flow is log-safe and commonly accepted,
whether using R 2F CT in t1 causes any decoder or auto-sequencing issues, and
any recommended handling for repeats or partial copy in an FD-specific state machine.
73,
Wei AG6AQ
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions