You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Building such an index for all the statements is not manageable due to the explosion of the wikidata recently (more than 90M items) but it could be interesting to restrict its scope to a subset of properties that are used for transitive relations in WD like:
P279 (subclass of)
Most of the time we would like to express things like in SPARQL ?item wdt:P31/wdt:P279* ?class. This means that there’s one “instance of” and then any number of “subclass of” statements between the item and the class.
My intuition is also that most of the time we want to express something like that:
an initial property seed (P31 or P106)
then follow the "subclass of" hierarchy (P279*)
For that a reverseP279Statement db could do the job
Best regards
Olivier
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Building such an index for all the statements is not manageable due to the explosion of the wikidata recently (more than 90M items) but it could be interesting to restrict its scope to a subset of properties that are used for transitive relations in WD like:
Most of the time we would like to express things like in SPARQL
?item wdt:P31/wdt:P279* ?class
. This means that there’s one “instance of” and then any number of “subclass of” statements between the item and the class.My intuition is also that most of the time we want to express something like that:
For that a reverseP279Statement db could do the job
Best regards
Olivier
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: