Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FEATURE] Feature Comparison Table #83

Open
kashifkhan0771 opened this issue Jan 1, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

[FEATURE] Feature Comparison Table #83

kashifkhan0771 opened this issue Jan 1, 2025 · 0 comments
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation good first issue Good for newcomers help wanted Extra attention is needed low-priority Change or fix is a low priority

Comments

@kashifkhan0771
Copy link
Owner

Feature Description

Add a feature comparison table to the library’s documentation(README). The table will highlight the capabilities of the library compared to similar libraries.


Use Case

A feature comparison table helps users quickly understand what makes this library unique and why they should choose it over alternatives.


Proposed Solution

Create a Markdown table to compare features such as performance, supported locales, or dependency size. Focus on areas where the library excels and keep the table updated with new features.


Additional Context

Include this table in the README.


Pseudo Code

| Feature                  | This Library    | Library A       | Library B       |
|--------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|-----------------|
| Random String Generator  ||||
| CSV to JSON Conversion   ||||
| Locale Support           | ✅ (US, UK)     || ✅ (US, FR, DE) |
| Dependency-Free          ||||
@kashifkhan0771 kashifkhan0771 added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation help wanted Extra attention is needed good first issue Good for newcomers low-priority Change or fix is a low priority labels Jan 1, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation good first issue Good for newcomers help wanted Extra attention is needed low-priority Change or fix is a low priority
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant