Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

What with `` gensym '' #644

Open
albertvanderhorst opened this issue Aug 22, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

What with `` gensym '' #644

albertvanderhorst opened this issue Aug 22, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@albertvanderhorst
Copy link

In step 8 I was suddenly confronted with gensym. That may be familiar to lispians, but not to me. gensym was not introduced in any way, and the test of or in step 8 requires it. (I chased down or in other files, I think that it should be contained in step8_macro.mal).

Apparently (gensym) is a command that generates a new free symbol, that cannot be evaluated as yet.
In my implementation all objects have a slot for names and linkings, and a mapping is made filling in the objects name and linking it in in the appropiate environment. As an object is free, the link to an object is filled in. An anonymous object (e.g. a number) has the slot for the name free, ready to be filled by def! and linked into environment.
The phrase (condvar (gensym) puzzles me in the definition of or. Does that really mean that the value of condvar is a symbol,
so that evaluating condvar yields a symbol? So that we have the same kind of problems like in m4, figuring out how many quotes we must put around expression to prevent evaluation?

I recommend that gensym is introduced in step 0 , or at the latest in step8.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant