Suggestion: Sugar syntax of (define-keyset ) should be deprecated

[CryptoPascal31]

Currently, Pact allows to use this sugar syntax:

(define-keyset  `xxxx)

which is internally translated to:

(define-keyset 'xxxx (read-keyset 'xxxx))

IMHO, this should be removed or at least deprecated. Because this shortcut does not provide any functionality just confusion.

Think that for many people the differences between (read-keyset), (define-keyset) and (enforce-keyset) are not clear and confusing, and are source of many security issues.
Allowing to use the sugar syntax just makes things even harder to understand.

[jwiegley]

Thank you for the report, @CryptoPascal31, Pact team will discuss.

[CryptoPascal31]

Following the same philosophy, some other old keyset's related confusing syntax should be deprecated as well:

(enforce-guard "my-keyset")

Confusing because "my-keyset" is in fact not a guard.
and strictly internally translated to :

(enforce-guard (keyset-ref-guard "my-keyset"))

---

Module keyset governance should be deprecated:

(module my-mod "my-keyset"

Devs can replace it efficiently with capability governance. And moreover keyset governance is confusing because handled differently than capability governance (strict evaluation at first deployment time)