-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Test effects of FOV number and/or cell count on profile strength #2
Comments
If we want the subsamples to have overlap and only from the field numbers 1,2,3,4 then we could do this with 4 config files, otherwise, we would need more, because the fields in the config file is the field number, not the number of fields. For the subsample to not have overlap (or have partial overlap), we could subsample 4 fields from 9 fields by choosing fields 2, 4, 6, and 8. To subsample 3 fields from 9 fields, we could choose fields 3, 5, and 7, and so on. I think for this purpose we would want our subsamples to have overlap (to have the same cell numbers and to be the exact subsample of the category above it), but I think this is something to consider. We may also want to consider the site location discussion from slack; there will be differences in the cell numbers if site 1 located in a corner vs the center of a well. |
I went ahead and created the profiles for FoVs, with fields 1,2,3,4 and 4 config files. In making the profiles, I did not repeat what was existed in the previous profiles (i.e: I didn’t include the batches with only 1 site to the re-aggregation for subsample 1 site profiles --> this means the 1 site subsample batches include all the batches EXCEPT the ones that originally imaged at only 1 site [Scope1_Nikon_10X], and similarly did not include batches with only 4 site for re-aggregation for 4 site subsample, etc.--> this means the 4 site subsample batches only includes the batches with originally 9 sites that are now being re-aggregated for 4 sites); in metadata file, the rows for 1 site images per well were removed (Nikon 10X). Site and Filed are used in the names are interchangeable. |
Percent Replicating and Matching
Percent replicating
Percent Matching:
|
TODO - see if sphering (or whatever we end up replacing sphering with) helps to bring these numbers up |
We have a qualitative difference between conditions that have higher FOV counts (20X, typically) those with lower FOV counts (10X, typically, though not exclusively). This matches previous work
A couple of complicating factors here though -
To address these, I think we need to do 2 things -
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: