tg_number_of_participants <- 70
+tg_number_of_participants <- 65
fafi_number_of_participants <- 50
-stst_number_of_participants <- 7
+stst_number_of_participants <- 7
+bspd_number_of_participants <- 45
+
CER · BEANS is a framework for developing quantitative metrics for community engaged research (CER) that is balanced, nuanced, and expressive. It is a work in progress, and your feedback and contributions are welcomed.
diff --git a/docs/index.html b/docs/index.html
index d55538a..50d3286 100644
--- a/docs/index.html
+++ b/docs/index.html
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
-This is a total of 50 direct participants.
tg_number_of_participants <- 70
+tg_number_of_participants <- 65
fafi_number_of_participants <- 50
-stst_number_of_participants <- 7
+stst_number_of_participants <- 7
+bspd_number_of_participants <- 45We find that the Professional Development Project has a Participant Index (\(p_i\)) of 0.81 (adjusted) and a full Participant Score (\(p_s\)) of 127. Family as Faculty as an Infrastructure has a Participant Index (\(p_i\)) of 0.75 and a Participant Score (\(p_s\)) of 88.
+We find that the Professional Development Project has a Participant Index (\(p_i\)) of 0.81 (adjusted) and a full Participant Score (\(p_s\)) of 118. Family as Faculty as an Infrastructure has a Participant Index (\(p_i\)) of 0.75 and a Participant Score (\(p_s\)) of 88.
stst_engagement_hours <- 16
tg_engagement_hours <- 18
-fafi_engagement_hours <- 20stst_frequency_score <- 0.85
tg_frequency_score <- 0.50
-fafi_frequency_score <- 0.75stst_duration_score <- 0.75
tg_duration_score <- 0.85
-fafi_duration_score <- 0.75stst_number_of_infrastructure_products <- 8
-tg_number_of_infrastructure_products <- 10
-fafi_number_of_infrastructure_products <- 12stst_infrastructure_purpose <- 0.90
-tg_infrastructure_purpose <- 0.90
-fafi_infrastructure_purpose <- 0.95stst_infrastructure_co_construction <- 0.10
tg_infrastructure_co_construction <- 0.10
-fafi_infrastructure_co_construction <- 0.50stst_number_of_outputs <- 1
tg_number_of_outputs <- 0
-fafi_number_of_outputs <- 6stst_distribution_of_venues <- 0.10
tg_distribution_of_venues <- 0.10
-fafi_distribution_of_venues <- 0.90stst_inclusion_of_participants <- 0.90
tg_inclusion_of_participants <- 0.10
-fafi_inclusion_of_participants <- 0.50stst_number_of_partners <- 2
tg_number_of_partners <- 1
-fafi_number_of_partners <- 4stst_distribution_of_responsibility <- 0.5
tg_distribution_of_responsibility <- 0.5
-fafi_distribution_of_responsibility <- 0.9stst_distribution_of_material_support <- 0.5
tg_distribution_of_material_support <- 0.5
-fafi_distribution_of_material_support <- 0.5For the Professional Development project, impact at each degree is determined this way:
bspd_ripple <- data.frame(
+ group = c(0, 1, 2),
+ group_name = c(
+ "Teachers",
+ "Students",
+ "Family Members"
+ ),
+ values = c(45, 388, 1552)
+)fafi_ripple <- data.frame(
- group = c(0, 1, 2, 3),
- group_name = c(
- "Participants",
- "Contemporaries",
- "Future Students",
- "Future Families"
- ),
- values = c(50, 524, 648, 2592)
-)fafi_ripple <- data.frame(
+ group = c(0, 1, 2, 3),
+ group_name = c(
+ "Participants",
+ "Contemporaries",
+ "Future Students",
+ "Future Families"
+ ),
+ values = c(50, 524, 648, 2592)
+)stst_ripple <- data.frame(
- group = c(0, 1, 2),
- group_name = c(
- "Participants",
- "Family Members",
- "Friends"
- ),
- values = c(7, 28, 35)
-)stst_ripple <- data.frame(
+ group = c(0, 1, 2),
+ group_name = c(
+ "Participants",
+ "Family Members",
+ "Friends"
+ ),
+ values = c(7, 28, 35)
+)The Professional Development project has a Ripple Effect Score of 1529. The ripple effect plot, based on a Vogel Spiral, looks like this:
+The Professional Development project has a Ripple Effect Score of 1672. The ripple effect plot, based on a Vogel Spiral, looks like this:
The Family as Faculty as an Infrastructure project has a Ripple Effect Score of 1818. The ripple effect plot looks like this:
The STEM Studio project has a Ripple Effect Score of 47. The ripple effect plot looks like this:
+The Family as Faculty as an Infrastructure project has a Ripple Effect Score of 1818. The ripple effect plot looks like this:
The STEM Studio project has a Ripple Effect Score of 47. The ripple effect plot looks like this:
+
The Overall Score \(S_O\) for the STEM Studio is 69, the Overall Score \(S_O\) for the Professional Development is 182, and the Overall Score \(S_O\) for Family as Faculty as an Infrastructure is 183.
+The Overall Score \(S_O\) for the STEM Studio is 69, the Overall Score \(S_O\) for the Professional Development is 197, and the Overall Score \(S_O\) for Family as Faculty as an Infrastructure is 183.
An example of a detailed badge for a professional development program at a school. This badge contains multiple levels of information including the overall score, the ripple effect score, and direct indicators.
@misc{fprice2023,
author = {Jeremy F Price},
- title = {CER \&Middot; {BEANS:} {Community} {Engaged} {Research}
- {Balanced} {Expressions} and {Assessments} with {Nuanced} {Scores}},
+ title = {CER ⋅ {BEANS:} {Community} {Engaged} {Research} {Balanced}
+ {Expressions} and {Assessments} with {Nuanced} {Scores}},
date = {2023},
url = {https://github.com/jeremyfprice/cer-beans},
langid = {en}
}