Checkify with nested JITs #27891
Unanswered
thomaspinder
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Consider the following MWE
This is behaving as expected, and the following unit test would pass
However, should an end user try to JIT a function that wraps
_check_is_positive
, then an error is throw unless the new jitted fn. has checkify applied. You may see this below, were an end-user to implement_dummy_fn
and then JIT it, then an error would be thrown. This is undesirable, and I would prefer if there was an alternative way that I can apply checkify, whilst safeguarding against end-users jitting code.Stacktrace
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions