-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 187
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature-Request: Support for multiple X-Call-ID headers #339
Comments
at the moment we bypass the limit by finding the first call and and then do a search for that Call-ID |
Hi! If I understand this correctly, the problem is that Exended Flow from A call works as expected displaying B and C, but Extended Flow from B (or C) call only shows A call. Is this correct? |
yes that is correct senario 1 senario 2 reverse order of X-Call-ID header |
I have attached 2 pcap that show the 2 different senarios |
alternativ add support for Session-ID (rfc7329) as an alternativ to X-Call-ID |
agreed, more correct to support Session-ID according to RFC. |
if you have a call that is stretching overs several dialogs (A,B,C), it would be nice if the "F4 Extended" dialog support multiple X-Call-ID headers
currently it will only match on the first header, and depending on how I add them I can either make that dialog A will show B+C but dialog B will not be able to show C
or if I reverse the order of the header A will only show B and B will only show C
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: