insar_vs_GPS comparison with geometry in geographical coordinates #1010
Unanswered
amrit-thapa-2044
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 1 comment
-
The closest I have seen is here: https://github.com/nisar-solid/ATBD/blob/dcbf4229443dadf0eee0863144fbec852654fb56/methods/secular/Secular_Requirement_Validation.ipynb (Section 4.2 - 4.5) I'm not sure which is more common to use, as there's overlapping functionality in the two parts of the |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hello! I'm wondering if anyone has attempted to modify the code available at [https://github.com/insarlab/MintPy/blob/main/src/mintpy/objects/insar_vs_gps.py ] to support geometry in a geographical coordinate system [Hyp3-MintPy workflow]. It looks like the current implementation of the script relies on radar coordinates.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions