We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hi, It seems there's a bug in parsing footnotes when they are consecutive in a post. That is, if we have:
[^1][^2][^3] [^1]: first footnote [^2]: second footnote [^3]: third footnote
Only the last footnote is parsed correctly. Second footnote is not taken into account, and the first is converted badly.
But if we use two or more spaces between footnotes, like the following:
[^1] [^2] [^3] [^1]: first footnote [^2]: second footnote [^3]: third footnote
Conversion works fine.
Regards UnclePetros
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
OK, I've noticed if I change markdown engine from rdiscount to kramdown conversion works smootly.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Hi,
It seems there's a bug in parsing footnotes when they are consecutive in a post.
That is, if we have:
Only the last footnote is parsed correctly.
Second footnote is not taken into account, and the first is converted badly.
But if we use two or more spaces between footnotes, like the following:
Conversion works fine.
Regards
UnclePetros
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: