New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Label co-occurrence warning #159
Comments
The labels are designed to be hierarchy. This is shown in the table 1 from the paper: So they are supposed to co-occur because Pneumocystis is a Fungal Pneumonia.
There shouldn't be any ones missing a finding. There are ones labelled as
Maybe including something like table 1 will make it clear? |
This dataset is set up in a multi-label way, however most labels co-occur. The below table shows counts of unique label combinations over the 514 images in the AP and PA views. You can see, for example, that "Pneumonia" occurs in every row that has a label and is not labeled as "No Finding" (and furthermore, the second most common configuration is no label).
The README shows aggregate label counts; maybe it is worth including a summary like above too in order to warn users who may want to use the excellent Dataset class for fine-tuning?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: