Enlarging ontology using obtained data

[mmaltsev]

Does it make sense to go through newly obtained properties along with their values and try to find some, which can lead us to not yet discovered standards / organizations / ... ?

A good example of such predicate can be lingg:hypernym.

[igrangel]

Can you elaborate an example of one Standard, e.g., OPC_UA, or IEC 61131 or other similar to see if we can get interesting relations?

[mmaltsev]

OPC_UA has an object dbr:Protocol for predicate lingg:hypernym. Such a value have 709 other entities, including Common_Industrial_Protocol, X10_(industry_standard) which are not presented in the STO as for now (whole list can be found here). On the other hand, some of the standards in the list seem to be unrelated to our area of interest.
IEC 61131 has an object dbr:IEC for predicate lingg:hypernym. Such a value have 5 other entities, including IEC_61030 which is not presented in the STO as for now (whole list can be found here). This list also consists of unrelated standards.

[igrangel]

We can already start including the categories we know are important for our domain
E.g., http://dbpedia.org/page/Category:Industrial_automation.

Check the property skos:broader. In this case, they are also important for us dbc:Automation, dbc:Industrial_computing, dbc:Production_and_manufacturing
And here we made it :)
http://dbpedia.org/page/Industry_4.0

[igrangel]

Some DBpedia topics which are of interest to us:

1. http://dbpedia.org/page/Industry_4.0
2. http://dbpedia.org/page/Category:Industrial_automation.
3. http://dbpedia.org/page/Category:Internet_of_Things
4. http://dbpedia.org/page/Category:Industrial_computing
5. http://dbpedia.org/page/Category:Smart_grid
6. http://dbpedia.org/page/Category:Production_and_manufacturing
7. http://dbpedia.org/page/Category:Product_lifecycle_management
8. http://dbpedia.org/page/Computer-aided_manufacturing